Tell me what porphyria has to do with this discussion.
The monster under the bed.
Since nothing ever evolved, and since Adam had the greatest intelligence a human could have, it wasn't that hard for Him.
In FANTASYLAND everyone thinks it?s real
So now you are blaming poor immigrants for a Policy Trump and friends created and implemented?
You keep repeating those two verses, which are not by themselves, they are surrounded by context; Exodus 21:12,16 22:21, 23:9, Leviticus 19:33-34 Isaiah 1:11-20, 58:5-10 and the written context far outweighs the unwritten context that you would like to apply to the two verses.
Yes, during class. Ridiculing Christian beliefs about creation, for starters, without prompting.
I never removed myself from the mountains, but never fit in music wise. It was all country here and there I was with Slayer, anthrex, megadeth and pantrea. Not really a fit lol. But I like a wide range of music, my wife got me into some R&B and rap, I infected her with Pantera and slipknot. So fair is fair :D
You are the fundy
The OT myth is bronze age. There is nothing wrong with beliving in god. The issue is when you ignore reality and cling to debunked myths
Tell your hypothetical friend I'm doing great.
I figured, just wanted to make sure, R&I'd
I wonder how humans ever got along before "God" was invented about 6022 years ago and before Jesus was conceived in the end of March about 4 BCE.
The question is how do you have conversations with leprechauns, but you don't strike me as an honest person, so I don't expect an honest response from you.
It wasn't their money....lol. I wonder where you think we took 185 billion dollars in cash.
Do you really think you can prove creation by attacking evolution through quote mining and rhetoric?
Geocentric model was "established science" for many centuries. Also, mutations have recently been found to not be random.
Don?t believe the CO2 bullshit.
Call it what you want....he didn't serve and has no business criticizing the war record of anyone who did. And my prior assertion about the far-fight smearing the service records of others for political purposes still stands. For the record I did NOT vote for John Kerry and didn't support him. However the Swift boat allegations were discredited and shown to be for political purposes....many of those questioning Kerry's war record were not anywhere in the vicinity during the time and lace he was serving. The attacks on McCain about the Forestall tragedy, as well as his time in a POW camp are all political smear tactics from the far right.
No, actually many misunderstand Hobby Lobby. Since there was a mechanism that a business could have their employee's reproductive health care funded by other sources the SCOTUS just said that this business could use that mechanism as the least intrusive means. But the employees still got their health coverage. In fact on page 6 of the ruling the justices make clear that this would have to have occurred one way or the other.
Fair warning. Gracie and I know French.
I have no doubt. I know Yvonne knows her stuff.
No, my sarcasm is because what you're talking about ISN'T REAL. No one is "ignoring" Muslim terrorists. We fought 2 wars, one of which we are STILL fighting, ostensibly for the purpose of fighting Muslim terrorism just in the last 20 years. Everyone knows what religion the 9/11 hijackers and the Shoe Bomber and the car-running-over-civilians in Europe terrorists were. Denmark just got done banning the burqa. What MORE do you feel should be said that isn't?
I don't disagree that perception precedes response, but beauty is not something to be perceived, i.e. it is not a property of perception, but of thought about that perception.
eternal destruction and hell fire and damnation :(
If it was a pizzeria that Clinton walked into, every MAGAbilly would accuse it of harboring a child sex ring.
you mean ONE human. What kind of a god punishes not only a person that commits the 'crime' but every human to ever live?
Of course, being a liberal, you are completely wrong, and deliberately false.
yur heart is hardened.. and I am not so generous as to give that which is holy to dogs... :) LOL!!!!Matthew 7: 6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
I was hoping you'd get the message from me thrusting it at you constantly!
I'm happy to concede that Mr. Intolerant Baker believes himself to be morally correct. In my opinion he isn't. Thankfully, we aren't deciding the case on the basis of what is moral but merely on what is lawful under current notions of American jurisprudence.