Morals are subjective. What is moral to us is not moral to someone else. I read an interesting analysis of the Germans and ethics. The Germans did not become unethical in their approach to the Jews. Instead they accepted a new ethic in which eliminating the Jews became the new morality however distasteful it was to them.
You know you like it
No name of any witness for Muhammed's great first "revelation"? That's what I thought.
And when it's not labeled as such?
Wish I could celebrate some jewish holidays...I want to throw plates and wear curls and a funny hat too!
Lol actually at 13, yep it was the Yahoo chatrooms. And MSN.
Fine. And you are still failing.
So true! Forget the ones that cried themselves to sleep due to fertility problems and chose to adopt.
So I'm available the next time you're looking for a foursome.
Things haven't been all that hot here yet. The real heat won't kick in until July. Have a wonderful summer. ;-)))
'Disrespect' seems a little harsh.
They ban because there is no logic on their side.
Not really. There are verses that talk about being persistent and persevering in prayer, but even these do not suggest that your prayer can somehow control God or cause Him to be obligated in some way.
And did you know, that Christians and others do not worship a female god? Christians insist as do others, that there is only a male god. They do NOT call him God the Mother, but God the Father.
It is entirely true. The National Socialist party only included socialist in the party name because socialism was popular at the time and calling themselves socialist attracted followers. But in reality, and according to historical fact, there was nothing whatsoever socialist about the National Socialist party in either economic or political policies. Hitler hated socialism and the Nazis began rounding up and imprisoning socialists immediately following their ascension to power. Pretty hard to be a socialist when you are putting real socialists in prison. The Nazis were populist, nationalistic, protectionist capitalists. Sounds like Trump, doesn't it?
And REwritten by this Victor. Lol. ??
Argumentum ad populum.
I have children in their twenties.
No, I haven?t read Shang Yang. Perhaps you can share more substantively about his thought.
Faulty premise. Didn't happen, IMO. Also:
There should be a tax on all all computer and robotics-related enterprises.
Mexican-Americans probably, but not the blue-eyed blond type. That sun will cook their skin to a crisp, they just want do it! A matter of fact I would rather hire immigrant labor as opposed to Americans as they just flat out work harder and don?t talk on those damn cell phones every five-seconds when they should be working.
Are you aware that there are two key concepts you are ignoring? First, Goedel?s Incompleteness Theorem provides a fine definition for the limitations of any mathematical system, one key aspect being Self-Referentiality in parallel with the linguistic paradox, "This sentence is false." That is part of the Epistemology dealt with in point 2.
So, essentially what you are saying is that Christian or Islamic fundamentalism is 'worse' or bad? Isn't that only an assumption on your part? Wouldn't you agree that the lack of any fundamentalism is worse than any fundamentalism?
Explain what you want to see.