"Metaphysical knowledge" is a self-contained contradiction.
Only after the blueprint is subjected to physical construction. Prior to that the building only exists in potential.
The Lord, the Lord: vengeful and wrathful upon those who displease him is a jealous God.
Unknown is never found unnecessary. Only the known.
Well... the story of the Good Samaritan comes immediately to mind.
When did barbecue get invented? :)
and interestingly, Christianity is a relationship but its also very much 'by the Book' -
Sorry, I don't have any interest in refuting 12 different points. Why don't you pick your strongest one and we can discuss that.
That doesn't sound like the case here. They don't have a jokey kind of relationship.
"A tumor is also human life"
Let's see... yesterday was Gay Wedding Cake Day. Today should be ... Abiogenesis Day? Or is it Proof of Jesus' existence in Josephus and Tacitus Day? Or Abortion Day?
Silver lining right?
I don't speak Wbony !
Perhaps I could have stated religious construction in order to include the middle path, but Stalinism is not a contributor morality. Stalinism is autocratic totalitarianism.
No thanks, you are stating you can be oppressed for having to use a word while this minority is never oppressed in the same country.
Someone who insists on scripture being literal in the same manner that fundamentalists do in order to dismiss the claims of believers who are not fundamentalist. i.e. a theist's claims have no veracity because they are not a "true" Christian. It's just another "Not a True Scotsman" fallacy.
Nope ginsburg was asleep ??
Sorry my friend, if you?re really interested in knowing this, you will get for yourself. That makes it personal for you.
What two people do, consensually, in their own car (or their own home, hotel room etc) is a matter entirely between them. UK law is not stating that if someone looks in your kitchen window, and sees something they *disagree* with, that they can bring a case against you. However it would be an entirely different matter if you went into their front garden, or stood in front of their desk at work, and thus *forced" yourself (and whatever you were doing) upon them. It's in the latter case that you would be guilty of deliberate harassment.
Right. I just meant that the definition of the thing would change if there was evidence to support it. The likelihood of that happening would be infinitely worse than chance because evidence for things that people make up off the top of their heads doesn't simply appear.
Satire? I see reality.
No he favours the hag fish
Without a creator -- everything is just random, with a capital 'R.'