Sometimes you have to use something they will recognize.
A bartender doesn't get in the car with you, the gun store owner doesn't travel with you to shoot someone. The baker has to go to the wedding.
Yes, the Central European EU member states are diametrically opposed to accepting refugees. I think Brussels' attempts at forcing their compliance is among the top reasons those countries have lurched further to the right in recent times.
What if it were just her own personal preference? The motivation behind discrimination should be irrelevant to whether it's legal, IMO. And you can't sue just for "discrimination." It has to be illegal.
Missed the point. This is not about a medical procedure, this is about the stone-age tradition and the exception from a human right for bodily integrity for religious reasons. And while the AAoP doesn't openly condemn the ritual practise they do so indirectly by stating:
I swear my dog is the only dog that purrs. She purrs and snuggles up to me when I do that.
Actually that's all it is. I already covered the details of why in a previous post. No deflection from me at all.
Sounds like your argument has geometry but no topology.... Do research twice opine once.
Those who have suggested that God was speaking as the trinity are those who were taught by the Wolves Jesus warned about at Matthew 7:15. When one bothers to study the Old Testament, they absolutely do NOT come away with the thought that a triune god was revealed. A tremendous theological stretcccchhhh.... is needed to produce such a being.
Yes, you absolutely are entering into a contract in all these instances, from an economics standpoint. It's not a written contract, but it's a contract. A verbal contract, an implied contract, a boilerplate contract like copyright - it's all contract.
Your looking for objectivity, like in mathematics. But like the concept of "beauty", morality is subjective and in the eye of the beyolder, guided by evolutionary predisposition, culture, and personal preference.
From reading your posts you have real trouble understanding written words.
LOL, thank for proving my point. Europe during the dark ages are full with fantastic accomplishments like :
How are you going to show that an objective moral is wrong when the morals you have now are nothing more than widely held opinions?
Very true, and people often get into casual relationships knowing it's going to end with a little bit of hurt -- either from beginning to want someone they'll never have or becoming an object of unwanted affections. I do see many people blowing that natural part of the casual relationship out of proportion because they think hookups are how relationships are supposed to start (in fact the only way in some people's minds, smh).
Wow, 1975..... many of his peers were predicting a coming Ice Age back in '75. I bet they had some impressive graphs too. I guess that made Broecker a "global cooling" denier.
Whining? For a high IQ, your discernment skills need to upgraded.
None of them ever do. The FISA court has been a rubber stamp of approval since its inception.
I love your avi btw
When I saw the promo I thought "OMG the mods are promoting spam conversations?"
Funny how in order to become a British Citizen you have to undergo a Citizenship test on the fundamentals of British values. The poster seems to have omitted that!