Regardless of the genders involved, too much focus is being put on the ceremony and not enough on the commitment. As far as your scenario, find another baker. Sure I suppose there are some cases where there's only one for miles around but for most people that's just not the case, and you can call the next one on the list who will happily bake you a cake for your gay wedding.
That was my thought as well, but we can hope it was part of a briefing when he looked into having a viable answer how ever remote for saying its a national security issue.
Then let's see it. All the scientific evidence I've seen disagrees with your statement.
The only "blue wave" will be the democrat party getting flushed down the toilet, with the rest of the CRAP.
Science is wrong, therefore God. lol
Not one we know anything about the source of.
You?re back!!! Hey, girl. Good to see you.
That is only a presumption, one does not really 'know' anything they claim to be evident. There is much more behind the scenes than one would ever imagine.
OH MY GOD THIS! I fvcking hate it when people take up both lanes, like they're fvcking heroes or something
I have seen no hypocrisy on the right. Generally, the response is to scold verbally the bigoted management of the Red Hen, and to organize a totally peaceful boycott.
Thank you, but I get my fill of atheism on this channel.
Richard J. Evans; The Third Reich at War; Penguin Press; New York 2009, p. 547: wrote that Hitler believed that in the long run National Socialism and religion would not be able to co-exist, and stressed repeatedly that Naz.ism was a secular ideology, founded on modern science: "Science, he declared, would easily destroy the last remaining vestiges of superstition". Germany could not tolerate the intervention of foreign influences such as the Pope and "Priests, he said, were 'black bugs', 'abortions in black cassocks'". Evans noted that Hitler saw Christianity as "indelibly Jewish in origin and character" and a "prototype of Bolshevism", which "violated the law of natural selection".
Who cares. As you haven't proven that Jeebus even existed and all you got for your proof is your brain-washing, your buybull and your belief he is real.
as soon as you say everyone is special, then that means nobody is.
You?re not even slick enough to catch a purposeful misspelling to communicate disdain. If the basic mockeries I have dropped on you and this article go right by you then I have little hope you?re capable of following my criticisms.
Please give us your opinion on that question.
However, I'd like to add that if this guy is guilty of murder, logic follows that a six-week pregnancy is a living being, and therefore logic would conclude that abortion should also be considered murder.
I'm not sure I agree. I might say a different standard, not higher standard, because an atheist insisting he is more rational is based on the rather obvious fact one can't prove the current Judeo-Christian God exists, and is acting upon some other more tactile evidence upon which to base conclusions. The religious simply uses faith, and attempts to claim that because he KNOWS God exists and the Bible is his word, his actions are rational based on that premise.
I wish it was legal to tase anyone gushing about 'the upcoming royal wedding'.
And against history, your Bible's prophecy fails in every faculty.
1) deity does not exist
What are the well known mechanisms that God uses to create things? Do you have any evidence that God has ever created anything at all?
This article is informative but it doesn't deal with the business owners and their payroll taxes. The laws are written in favor of the business owner. A civil fine for hiring these people while the worker is criminal? Doesn't make sense to me.