You seem to be ignorant of the traditional guru-disciple relationship of vedic culture about which I speak.
There are many who struggle with pornography: their favourite pages get stuck together, low bandwidth, dropping the phone at critical moments, the webcam accidentally shows your face, all the best bits are behind a paywall.
good morning all...
(Don't Worry) If There's Hell Below, We're All Gonna Go. :-)
Nobody is lying about my ongoing virginity.
Not sure what you mean here. Yes there are Christians in Canada. I am one of them. As far as the students go, you'd have to ask them.
Sounds like the cover-up bishops did to hide priests molestation of children. Is there anybody much more intelligent than I that can explain the difference?
Funny how you can?t answer whether Dr. Baum quotes directly from Porphry as to the followers Pythagoras allegedly signing Pythagoras' name to books they wrote. And by the way, Disqus prohibits personal identification. Why don?t you read Dr. Ehrman?s actual words contained on pp. 108-110 of "Forgery and Counterforgery."
The confusing part is that you call yourselves a
Just keeping it real.
Maybe you need to learn how to clarify. Calling it pathetic and discriminating then exiting is a piss poor way to debate. Cheers.
Or in other words...
Whooooa... Not as lucky but New Years eve 1975... Pontiac Silverdome... 62000 people... I was pushing a broom afterwards... Good show...
They aren't what - mistaken or born gay?
The nature of God changes the more we learn about our universe. Yet we retain the old stories and try to adapt them to our way of thinking.
You follow evidence that you BELIEVE supports god. The rest you take on faith. Sounds to me that you?re taking it all on ?faith?. Evidence is not something you ?believe?, it?s something you either accept as true or don?t accept as true. So, please share, if you will, your ?evidence? for the existence of a god. I?m not convinced your position is rational at all, but is more wishful thinking than anything.
It was used to cover up crimes in the few years it's been here, one is too many.
Why is it people are not allowed to talk about Obama or Hillary? Seems that is just a rather convenient way to scream "No fair!".
Yes, that's the sort of things that end up happening when you have unfettered capitalism and no social safety net or legislation to protect the poor and vulnerable. It's why you had so many people living in squalid poverty and disease in slums and tenements back in the mid to late 19th century. It wasn't until legislation (building codes, health codes, tenant protections, labor laws, welfare programs, etc.) and the unions arrived on the scene that things improved.
what? I thought it was either harpers or harris fault