You don't actually eat that shit do you?
Women should remain silent and she must be quiet says it all for me. He wanted the women to shut up.
Let's talk about all those things after we stop giving ridiculous tax breaks to the wealthiest of the wealthy.
Or a couple other, you know, "places" that aren't front. Or center.
1/2 day today - then no work til Monday. WOOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of these are they like?
YOUR OWN Pope Francis stated it was at 5%. Guess again.
Anger is an example. If a parent has anger management issues and struggles with violent tendencies, but chooses not to address these issues, such tendencies will affect others around him, including his own children. When children see their own parent acting in this manner they may mimic this habit, become abusive and angry themselves, marry someone who is abusive and angry, have children by this person, thereby repeating the cycle.
You are not countering what I said.
I just thought you might admit it. Never mind.
Excellent analogies for the things religion does to people:
That I have not! I'll have to check them out. I love the really old blues stuff. Lead Belly, John Lee Hooker, WC Clark..
Hitchens was even more anti-Muslim.
why are using Harry Potter spells?
why Would you need a creator if you have no beginning?
As I said circles, at the present time, there is no such test. The hypotheticals are just put there to make pro-lifers second guess their stance. God, if you believe in him, which I do but it seems many here don?t, does not make people gay. Nature is about procreation so even if you took God out of the equation, procreation is required to sustain a species. People use the word love in a very broad sense but carnal desires are not love...not the love Jesus speaks of in the Bible. Humans have freewill and everyone has predispositions. For some it is same sex attraction. In the Catholic view, to be attracted to the same sex is one thing, to act it out is another all together. We love people with these attractions regardless, however. Theological, Philosophical and Moral issues are involved here, issues that don?t seem to interest some of those here because they already know the answers. I have unfollowed because this site is a big waste of time. I just wanted to do you the courtesy of responding. God bless you.
I see Hamas threatening Argentinian athletes if they played Israel in Jerusalem.... and then when they cancel the match due to Hamas terrorist threats, they spin it and praise Argentinian
No, it's been good
That?s an issue within yourself.
Why ! He have paradise in the star. Ooh water w ,,
Yeah, about 30 years after the claimed event and so not contemporary to it. Nor is it known who wrote it. For documentation, that is a big issue.
Of course it does. Most people in Texas are right leaning and as such believe in personal responsibility and freedom. Being forced to accommodate everyone under threat of force from the government is certainly not "free".
Civility is a difficult task when the person you're conversing with says the Democrats are the ones in the wrong for being unable to solve a problem that was 100% caused by the GOP, and that persists because of the GOP.
"Harassment is governed by state laws, which vary by state, but is generally defined as a course of conduct which annoys, threatens, intimidates, alarms, or puts a person in fear of their safety. Harassment is unwanted, unwelcomed and uninvited behavior that demeans, threatens or offends the victim and results in a hostile environment for the victim. Harassing behavior may include, but is not limited to, epithets, derogatory comments or slurs and lewd propositions, assault, impeding or blocking movement, offensive touching or any physical interference with normal work or movement, and visual insults, such as derogatory posters or cartoons"...https://
I agree. Christian arguments for god are very often as logical as dividing a positive integer by zero. Zero evidence divided by some presumed personal experience still equals zero demonstrable reason to believe. Brilliant.
How embarrassing for you that this what not what happened in this article. There was precisely ONE white man (i.e. not plural) whose politics were not identified (i.e. not liberal)
You keep surprising me.