You got the point. bubba. The government made sure you invested the money so the country would benefit. Go to the head of the class.
You have not read what I posted. You have distorted. Please do not distort. I would think that as a moderator you would set an example.
Care to exchange notes on them? Maybe put them into practice?
Great. You can take my word for it, or you can wait till I dig up the source, but Reliance of the Traveller says that Islam's obligatory charity tax, zakat, can be spent on Muslims only, but not on Kafirs. And that's the main problem with Islamic ethics: it prescribes different treatment to Muslims and non-Muslims. OK, it is not prohibited to help a Kafir who is not at war with Islam, but zakat is for Muslims only.
I'm sorry Yvonne.
But you did. An unsupported assertion on your part that is based entirely on your religious delusions. Science shows there was never a first man or woman.
If you think that a dead Jew that wandered around a remote desert for about a year while wearing sandals and a robe was a real god - because an ancient book written by ignorant and superstitious men says so - you are an idiot.
Is this a trick question? o.O
Again, and I can't make this any clearer for you, am I a gravityist? Am I a germist? Am I an electromagnetist?
Exactly what it says:
First and foremost, I'm curious as to how the Bible could be portrayed as "all horror". Full disclosure, I am a Christian, but that means I've studied up. One of the biggest points of misunderstanding about the Bible comes from when people point out old levitical laws and say "look, it says this really harsh and violent thing!", but what people often overlook is that the Old Testament laws were replaced when Jesus came. If something is to be objectively true, then you can't just pick and choose what is true with it. I'd be happy to try and answer some questions people have about the Bible though. What do you guys think?
No problems just solutions!
That hole is the shape of your existential discontent.
Yes, you did. As long as gay people play by the arbitrary rules established by society - to blend in, to not engage in sex, to actively engage in false marriages, to sublimate themselves and fade into anonymity and obscurity - then they don't have to worry about violence or discrimination or all that nasty stuff.
The universe spontaneously came into existence. It began with itself and ends with itself. That is your belief, right?
There are gods that Yahweh believes in above him? Interesting.
Oops left off the last part
The 24% for trump set a high water mark for Republicans if my memory is working.
Oh, I have plenty of judges in my life to tell me when I'm making irrational choices. :) My point is that we are not reliably rational about everything because we all make very irrational choices and easily believe very irrational things.
Things haven't been all that hot here yet. The real heat won't kick in until July. Have a wonderful summer. ;-)))
Yep - fvck those guys lololololol
There is only a narrow band in which you could evolve to talk nonsense. You are here and talking nonsense. Therefore the universe has to be the way it is. How very circular of you.
I covered that already.
Sex dungeon holla!
If she's casual about getting engaged and married and is ok with this then great for her. But if she actually does want to be married I don't think he's the guy for her based on 7 years and still no marriage.
I was thinking badges but the pic has low resolution so I couldn't be sure.
There are only 2 logically possible options:
If I replace "true" with the more useful "pure"...then ?quien sabe?
I've heard that nonsense from others. Here is a quote from Politifact. "It?s too early to tell, as even the highest estimates of Trump?s spending can?t match former President Barack Obama?s eight years in office."
You argued that the average joe in America will pay the price. Daniel Frazier argued that the average joe in America will be fine due to the nature of the economics between the two countries. Your post above is a blatant attempt to change the terms of the argument.