1. Nope, wasn't aware of that.
First on the scene eh?????????how...convenient....????????
I am reading a book now by financial guy. Actuarial charts are going to have to reflect that in not too distant future we will be living to 110 and 120. Insurance companies are a little worried. How?s that for hanging around too long?
Our national health care would cover your mental health issues.
I was referring specifically to his "Change My Mind" series where he gives anyone a chance to persuade him. This series is a change from his earlier approach which I didn't particularly care for. Naturally, just as in real life, he gets the occasional extremist. However, I have seen him have exchanges with a variety of individuals in which both parties came across as respectful and enr gaging in an intelligent conversation. More often than not, the conversation ends with no change in opinion on either side, but you do get to hear more than one side of an issue which is far better than seeing two parties yelling at each other.
Is she potty trained? lol
The BBT seems to be supported, we have found the CBR( Cosmic Background radiation) that the BBT said had to be there and we found it. But this has zero to do with atheism and atheism itself says nothing about this.
Evasion is the language of duplicity.
Napoleon - on his ship in Egypt, preparing to declare Jerusalem 'the land of the Jews', and in conversation with French Philosophers about the existence and fruits of God's - said these simple words:
I guess the evidence would be that it's always been called Nazareth. We know a bit about the history of the city because in the later centuries, Christians became obsessed with finding artifacts from Jesus' day and so some pilgrims traveled to Nazareth in the 400s and 500s, and the Nazareth we know today is where they went.
You said, what mandate fee? You don't know what you're talking about - to which I've informed you I've personally paid that fee.
It was NOT said that he has a legal right to refuse service!
I see. And what manner of epistemology do you think you?re using in addressing me in such a non-Scientific specialist manner? It is not framed in terms of a verifiable/falsifiable format which can be tested in a laboratory. Duh.
You completely missed my point, Science has no idea of where conscientiousness resides within you or where it comes from.
YOUR own words: "It is not Jesus that is of importance here it is His teaching that are important."
And I believe you actually believe that, but independent research with a predetermined goal dictated by religion, is not independent, or research, or in any way science
I have no similar experiences so I would not be justified in believing you but neither can I say for certain that you did not experience such things so I cannot accuse you of lying or being dishonest simply because I haven?t shared a similar experience.