"that seems to" reading comprehension.
You invoke an imaginary being yet claim to be 'working with reality'?
Stalin did the same, I call it hereditary because the leadership passes from father to son.
Mark actually does know a fair bit about science, he's an engineer. I do think his 'looking under the hood' comment has come from reading about it from a creationist perspective, though. I may be wrong.
From nothing came nothing. It is all, still, nothing. Nothing never stopped being nothing.
You may just come across someone and you'll know instantly - they need to meet.
Cannot explain what?
Agree. Jesus is God. But the Child in the earth today is also Jesus.
Christians claim to hear the same voice. Who is correct? Both think they are right.
I had my choices in life and I took the most stable and lucrative one available.
Agreed that you will receptive fine...but no, not asking. And honestly this a is gender role that I think should stay. The truth is women as a whole are more receptive to marriage. Men tend not to be. The person that is least receptive asking is a smart move.
They doubt the process and the mechanism. I simply offer an alternative to...sentient, conscious, intelligent bacteria. Revisit God as Intelligence that did it, and did it His way.
you think a god being crucified is the same as a human and call me dishonest? Talk about rich
Oh Moses smell the roses!
Not really. You don't believe it, because you find it implausible. That's your prerogative, but it doesn't mean it's not true, logically speaking.
I think the human idea of a god is silly and childish (especially the Christian God), but we had a silly childish view of the world before we realized it wasn't the center of the universe, now didn't we?
Are you seeing if the Diet Coke hits the taps?