I must have missed when you posted it, or I would have participated. I guess I would be closest to the D group, though I didn't grow up with any particular faith. I believed something was there, but couldn't identify it.
The theory of evolution isn't some weak, fragmented evidence. You don't understand the evidence, and you tend to just copy and paste quote minned stuff about it.
Completely off topic, but I find one of my new fave indie designers. The styles reminded me of you. Have you heard of Whim By Aree?
Sadly I think many women have it worse than most men - in that they are stuck physically, emotionally and financially caring for a child (or children) when the father is AWOL.
Threesome or foursome?
exactly per my caveat you need to have no expectations
Nah, church in Norway did not lose 25.000 members in one month. They lost them loooooong ago. That was just moment when this become official. I guess you are not bothered when small children become members of some church, particularly yours, without having any idea about?
Every family has an uncle Eddie, right?
It is not a 'why' question.
If your beliefs are based upon verifiable evidence, then no faith is ever required. Only when a belief requires you to suspend logic and reason and accept it without verifiable evidence is faith ever necessary.
I would be in favor of that charge only if they also knew their child had some mental issues.
Whose estimate? Biblical/Mythological? Or Actual Historical?
One day TFCC will write a coherent OP in his own words.(Right!).
It is often dead wrong on histroy. So its not much god as such a document. It gets too much wrong and makes cliams no other spurce backs
Browser history -- No criminal history, no diary, and no journal hehe.
Wisdom? Why wouldn't it be worth pursuing?
If he liked the sound of it and decided to make use of it, that is his prerogative. Either way it is irrelevant because your tautology argument is bogus.
not really, you can be agnostic theist or agnostic atheist
Blame the modern passion for whitewashing greed. Greed prioritizes the individual over everything else. Of course the practitioners of the greed philosophy will tell that they had no intention of suggesting that the individual ignore the other issues, like killing people is a no-no, but the end results of greed are bad. Why? Because greed as a philosophy is unbounded. If prioritizing yourself somewhat fails to make the person content, it must be because the person was not greedy enough. More greed is even better! Still not content? More greed. The end result is psychosis or violence. The philosophy of greed informs that suicide is the worst possible copout.
And if it was a regular wedding cake that does not have any names or writing on it he would have made it and been none the wiser, right?
eh basic black with rose red tips would make more of a statement.
I don't see it, mate. It seems to me you have a certain feeling that tells you that it is right to think that they are oppressed yet this feeling clearly falls apart under scrutiny and once exposed to facts. I'm actually surprised you can't see it.
Big time! I don't ever want to see or hear his face again!!
And since our money is physical we wouldn't expect that to be authentic would we?
Talk to your fellow socialist jim_hitler in this threadnyou two jave a lot in common