oh looking up aguaman.... actor... but I think I know...
That's strange. When I searched google for "what is darwinism" I got this:
Canada has already seen two bank robberies and a murder committed by men wearing these. It's no longer a religious argument but one of security.
POP AND LEBRON PLEASE
Jesus will come soon with godly fury to destroy them all.
Today in Love Meow News.
That's why Danger is her middle name
If it is true Clarke said that, he is well overrated, as he is quite ignorant of what magic is. It has nothing to do with technology.
Your comment appears to be spectacularly reasoned and exceptionally well written.
For real. Where my girls and my wine and my gossip right about now.
Hey! How are ya?
Sorry, but your vision of God is, as far as I can understand it, a human construct. You posit God's existence (can't be disproved) but then you ascribe to God a lot projected human desires/wants/hopes.
I fully support the death penalty for attempted murder (and other crimes such as assaults that inflict serious injuries, rape, etc.).
I'd just like to say that love can be the most amazing, fullfilling and spiritually enlightening experience a person can feel. I have just hit 12 years with my hubby, and it's still getting stronger and more interesting every day. Don't give up after a bad experience guys. You won't regret trying it once you get the right one.
Well, "you and CLEETIS" can rearrange your thinking...
Ok. We can compromise. I am selectively closed-/open-minded.
That only happened when the Jews revolted against Roman rule. Before that, Romans ruled Israel like they ruled other nations.
Your premise is wrong. It?s not that Christians don?t understand per se, but what difference does it make because it?s arbitrary. An atheists morals can change, and there is nothing to say that the change is any better or any worse. Atheists say they base their morals on what is best for humanity as a whole. That assumes that they know what?s best for society as a whole; however, their morals are completely arbitrary. An atheist could change their moral values, and there?s nothing to say that it?s objectively better or worse, because right and wrong/good and evil is just something made up in your head and isn?t actually real. You could murder somebody, and say it was for the better of society, and you would be morally fine if enough people agreed with you.
That's the best.