The two paragraphs are a brief summary of the article. It doesn't provide all the details. And you leave yourself open for saying something incorrect if you don't bother reading the article in its entirety.
Indeed. Thats right it wasnt all the expansion draft.
A very slow Australian child at that
I take it back. we should help the unlucky as well...but it should be UP TO a certain point.
Nothing, if that's what you're into.
Because that is living a life that pleasures the here and now?
We didn't realize there were two versions of the Koran. It is clear that the Islamist terrorists use the original unabridged one but we are not aware there was a milder modified version. If standard Muslims have problems with the radical version, why do we RARELY hear of them doing or saying anything about it? Could it be that the Koran both versions of Muslims obey states that if they dare do or say anything they must be eliminated? Something to do with apostates. Individuals like Tarek Fatah are incredibly brave.
Try thinking out of the box:)
Drugs don't need as much enforcement as we have now.
Nope, not true.
Conservative Chick, you either live in a fantasy world or are intellectually dishonest, doesn't really matter which because you're not telling the truth. Shall we share a few thousand images of the Obamas doctored to be monkeys, apes, opposite-gendered? No sale, but #fail
Must of been some fickle relationships to begin with.
It fits here.
That's pretty much my definition. For using this term on women I'd say it's the same behavior that you'd call a man a AH.
WRONG MARXIST CUNT!
which are not qualities we deem acceptable in our society. There is a good reason we made those laws.
And this is why I blocked him. Because you just cannot debate a person who moves the goalposts again and again, or uses false equivalence, or No True Scotsman or Strawman arguments.
if you don't see how pivoting the conversation of "straying from biblical text" to "you have faith as an atheist" is a strawman, then we'll be done soon.
what's so funny?
It would, it's just impossible under capitalism, certainly in any just way. Still, advocating for it is imo essential, as it allows for a more in-depth, systemic analysis, but imo it must always be connected to the critique of "globalisation", or better, imperialism. Always analyse where the rich countries are on the global network of production and how they manage to extract so much value from the value chain, even when they don't add much actual productive work to it.
You keep denying their is a flaw despite being shown the flaw many times. The issue is with you.
They have already ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (2014) that closely held corporations can have religious beliefs. But it's not something that would have come up in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, as the bakery's incorporation as an LLC appears to include no one else but Philips the baker.
I?m a lady on the streets and a freak between the sheets. Mother in law will never know what I?m doing to her precious ?baby boy? lol