I have mentioned this before, but if I'm in a relationship, and I'm on my way to see my SO, it seems like other women are more attentive, smiling, even flirting sometimes, and I notice it. But when I'm with her, I really don't notice that element. It doesn't really register.
im sure your prediction of november 2016 were just as accurate as election night 2018! lol
No need to hang out in ladies circles - all well known facts available via Google:
Wait...I thought you were trying to argue that crimes vs. dudes were investigated more seriously than crimes vs ladies. I honestly never considered you might be making the case that men were less likely to be investigated than women.
God created man and woman and said to them be fruitful and multiply the whole earth. God created the first couple and that is the model of a family that He intended, man & woman and God preformed their wedding ceremony. God created Adam and made a help mate for him and that was not Steve, but Eve.
Oh my. I?m glad I didn?t click the link now.
Show how much you know about science and evidence. Evidence is not true or false (unless you are Trump), evidence is weak/strong or direct/circumstantial. There has been multiple prayer studies all of which have come to the same conclusion. Prayer has a negligible effect and in some cases makes it worse.
Because they were bits of Mars Bar crumbs that the Martians were munching.
Did Alexander the Great write about things that we don't believe are possible, like coming back from the dead? If he just wrote about finding amazing animals and going on a conquest to other lands then that's pretty believable. Zombies are not. Or are all claims equal in your eyes?
A dude is trying that in this thread.
By my reckoning.
see the comments above re the number of books in the bible.
No knock raids aren't a problem? Seriously? Usually that is just reserved for drug dealers, where they storm in like KGB or Gestapo busting through the door like gangbusters. What kind of totalitarian society do you really want to live in? I even find this kind of crap squeamish even used on drug dealers. Let alone grandmothers who think the cops are home invaders and the cops shoot her dead over a small bag of pot.
If your concern is about the consequences of anal sex, I gather that you have no objection to lesbian relationships.
Then you must just hate it when people run around tossing out neo-cons, right?
Posting opinions on social media, attending a rally, or joining a political association are all basic democratic activities, and do nothing to create a hostile work environment. Citing them as rationale to fire an employee, is, to my mind, equally legal, but equally immoral as persecuting those of minority sexual interests, be they burlesque or homosexual.
Everything, of course.
Attachment styles as a result of ones experience with their caretakers combined with life experiences resulting from said styles of attachment.
Yep. Faith does not require dogma. Dogma mess up. Faith require only God.
How do you know there has been no answer?
Okay, so bottom line here...did the SC overturn the decision? The answer is yes. As such, he should be able to sue for losses and damages. He has been cleared of all wrong doing by the highest court in the land, has he not? Or did I miss the part where the SC ordered it back to the HRT and asked them not to consider his religious beliefs in such a negative light? Seeing as that was the crux of the matter, his religious beliefs, it would be hard to prove he wasn't being asked to surrender his religious principles in order to satisfy someone else's principles. That, it would seem, sets a pecking order for human rights, and that's a pretty slippery slope. What if a brown man accuses a black woman of something? Does brown trump black? Or does woman trump man? Do religious rights trump someone else's right to have a wedding cake made at a specific shop, when there are literally hundreds of other options for them?
But it doesn't make them vampires, any more than having priapism makes you the Roman god Priapus.
They could have baked it for them! All that is needed in that case is a little imagination.
Nope, not gnostic.
Trust me, I?ve had to gnaw mine off quite a few times !
Not promoting is not the same as censoring. He can still be heard, he can put out new music and do whatever he wants. That just shows that the company doesn't want to be associated with his allegations. It's sad that is happening over a "he said, she said" and there's no real evidence.
Like I say, put up or shut up. Make a world without blood and guts, or else admit you're talking out your arse. You have NO IDEA what you're talking about, and I'm sure you know this yourself. So you need to get some kind of connection to reality before you can even begin to have serious thoughts about why things are the way they are.