You missed the point bubba. They don't get counted as unemployed if they are standing on the corner. There are thousands in the inner city and coal mine districts. What's wrong with a living wage law?
lol, that was actually agreeing with you
Are there any neutral, unbiased historians? There was no real science much before the middle 1500s. And then the church tried to subdue it, see Galileo and Bruno.
If there were dream justice all the guys would look on with jealousy or inadequacy while the ladies swooned.
Women have resorted to abortion for millennia. Back then, until relatively recently it was dangerous, illegal and could end up with the woman in jail. In some benighted places like San Salvador this is still the case.
I imagine there was a lot of repetition. And, come to think of it, no pictures? That doesn't sound like a "normal" stalker to me.
I would only add that both the extreme left and the extreme right are like two arrogant and repugnant bookends.
Kool aid and vodka is a classy drink for a lefty.
Except their are atheist who do follow and practice a religion.
The Bible should not be taken any way. As the moment you "take" it one way or the other you are prescribing to God.
Okay, so bottom line here...did the SC overturn the decision? The answer is yes. As such, he should be able to sue for losses and damages. He has been cleared of all wrong doing by the highest court in the land, has he not? Or did I miss the part where the SC ordered it back to the HRT and asked them not to consider his religious beliefs in such a negative light? Seeing as that was the crux of the matter, his religious beliefs, it would be hard to prove he wasn't being asked to surrender his religious principles in order to satisfy someone else's principles. That, it would seem, sets a pecking order for human rights, and that's a pretty slippery slope. What if a brown man accuses a black woman of something? Does brown trump black? Or does woman trump man? Do religious rights trump someone else's right to have a wedding cake made at a specific shop, when there are literally hundreds of other options for them?
Where is anyone saying it is nearly instant?
And he's very upset with the answer to that question.
20 years? Hmm. Yeah not much.
LOL our moms might be sisters then ;)
LOL, that's a good one, especially coming from a Russian Bot!
Because the otherside of the world already had that connection. We do not deny the creator and our teachings are just. I don't need middle men to show me the way home while acting as gate keepers to what they often disregard for earthly desires.
Did I say "that's all I have" from Chinese culture?
Nope. I said there are already Forums functioning in Wisdom. No laws and no law-enforcers. Thus it is a Reality. But I do understand you trying your best not to see the evidence. It is staring you right in the eyes. No use trying to close them.
American definition of civility: mocking the disabled, womp womp.
Eve: GOD SAID TO AVOID THE SERPENT!
I said exactly that to my wife....POW right in her filty yaktrap.
You once again demonstrate that you do not understand much and have a very simplistic idea about scientific evidence.
Pornographic, yes. Foreskins, pulling out of your sister-in-law, sex with your daughters, baby eating and other goodies.
Nope. You don't have to. That has a message printed on it in words.
The moral standards that apply to those who choose to adhere to it. If you don't adhere to it, why do you care?
"Most whites are unskilled. Why do you think illegals only take jobs from blacks?"
Okay, did Caeser exist?
Even if everything natural were non-intelligent, it does not logically follow that everything intelligent is non-natural.
That would largely depend on the type of questions being asked.