You should totally change your name to "Amy A Threat To Public Safety." :)
Saying "good luck", by the way, does not imply that I believe anything; do you struggle with language comprehension in general? Now, if I'd said "don't walk on the cracks because you'll get bad luck" then, sure... but using the word doesn't in and of itself prove that one has some crazy notions.
One drop for the cat, one for me...another drop for the cat, two more for meeee.....
Tell us exactly which word in your sentence was the subject. Then tell us exactly which verb was the predicate.
The celebration still went on. Just the focus wasn't on the eagles.
Its the wayI word things that seems to get me into trouble.... I will have to try to be a little more subtle, in future, if I can find the words to do so.
It is indeed an ad hominem.
What if the moon is made of cream cheese? Relevance please?
When I look up, directly up, the sun appears to be a ball of light,
No, I cannot.
I thought you were referring to Trudeau.
Doesn't your hubby mind you dating? lol
Give over do, we are taking you guys on all the time. Right here in this thread.
Don't even think of going in my space... You may never return! :-)
LMFAO so all those adults who committed these crimes based on their "holy book and gawd's words" and their religion that comes from it, are now babies sh%tt#ng in their diapers huh?
Was that an argument?
I can understand it, as nearly all women have been sexuality harassed and most have been sexual assaulted by men. I can't say how I would feel in that situation. I'd probably be wary of the men at fist, observed them for a while, and then if I saw they were okay and there for the right reasons, it'd be fine.
Were they uncomfortable because the men were too hot to stand next to? Lol
My skepticism aside, I think the word "verifiable" is a hinge.
"unless you're donating one to her, shut the fawk up."
I lived right down the street from the guy with the sister wives. The one on TV. Saw him at the liquor store routinely. LOL
"They lined up for work, food, shelter and good treatment"
There is nothing rational about about a discussion based on a claim no one made.
Trump's supporters, at least the ones I've encountered on Breitbart and elsewhere, refuse to acknowledge any facts whatsoever that run counter to what Trump or the right wing web sites tell them. There are a few reliable web sites for which I regularly attach links and, when those web sites are in one of my posts, that post is immediately marked as spam. Very few right wing types ever read principled conservative journalists like Hugh Hewitt.
You asked me to paste it, I did, you cried about it.
I'm not sure I agree with your assessment of the text:
So, wait, You are claiming as support for your claim " there IS no process in evolution to explain new splits and new complex structure" Discover Institutue interview that says:
The two paragraphs are a brief summary of the article. It doesn't provide all the details. And you leave yourself open for saying something incorrect if you don't bother reading the article in its entirety.
I came up in northeast L.A., which was always hip and deep in lowrider and biker culture. As kids, we were able to watch car-show quality lowriders and choppers being put together in local garages. Some were actually featured in magazines. It was normal for us to stroll past no less than six lowriders in different states of repair/restoration/customization every day on our way to school. The biker on the corner specialized in custom paint jobs. So it was common to see and hear choppers roaring up and down the street on a daily basis. As a result, we all grew up to buy, restore, and cruise our own lowriders and or Harleys and many of us to this very day. I tell people that my "midlife crisis" began at 18, which is when I bought and restored my first lowrider and I figure the 67 Chevelle I'm working on now will be my last.