No, you are killed by the bear, not murdered. You go into his territory and he defends his territory. He kills you just like we kill people in war. If he kills you to eat it is no different than us killing animals to eat. That's killing. Intentionally, with premeditation, taking the life of a human is murder.
Yes, which isn't exactly evidence for a god, at least not any meaningful definition of a god.
LOL I think a lot women don't have them at first. And this seems a total valid reason to fake it.
I have given you an article that was verified. The abortionist in question was tried and convicted.
No, I don't, but who cares if I do or not. We aren't discussing physics
I don't see Bills on the camera anywhere...
I voted HRC because she's actually smart enough to know that Putin is the enemy and Canada is the ally. You voted for the guy who thinks Putin is the ally .........<coughs>......I mean personal business partner, and thinks Canada burned down the WH in 1812.
But to answer your question no. The person who decided to kill someone is still a criminal.
Big fat 0.
I'd argue no one is looking to use understanding of mental illness as a tool to discriminate. Rather, we're looking to better understand the root causes of a problem.
You can request anything. A request is not a demand. You would be an idiot to turn in your phone without it being subpoenaed. If I were one of them, I would smash a phone up, claim it was mine, and tell them they can come after me as soon as Hillary is behind bars.
wow, I've never heard such a bigoted comment before
If no god is found, then no god is necessary.
We don't ridicule Christianity in any special way. We ridicule belief in metaphysical beings that cannot be proved to exist. It may look as if we ridicule Christianity but it only looks that way because most of the religious people who post here are Christians pushing a Christian viewpoint.
Believe me, I know it's weird. I just get a really gross feeling when it comes to some netted fabrics. It makes me super uncomfortable. I can't explain it.
While I agree with you on the technicality, I'll also claim that not all assertions are created to be equal. This is where we might segue into a discussion on epistemology and why the nonfalsifable, unevidenced ones don't get to sit at the front of the line.
I'm sure Mussolini must have.
Who is reaping the benefits you disgusting sycophant?
Come to think of it, he's also jealous of France's Macron for the same reasons.
Laws ammended to encompass the spectrum of human identity are not to legislate acceptance but pertain to fair treatment. You still get to think awful things, you just don't have a legal excuse to commit hateful acts.
.. and you've been struck from the jury list. Here's your check. Thanks for doing your public service.
A poll of which is worse (especially when it comes to religious ideologies and is heavily loaded like this one) tend to become a race to the bottom.