OK, well you can certainly consider factual information contained outside of the article, so why don't you take a look?
Nah, it didn't. He's a racist piece of trash.
Neither of us know that you you claim to.
....you still have to ask yourself how they ended up getting in that position in the first place. They wouldn't be struggling if they'd just took a minute to relax and see what's up with the cops stopping them, if you don't have anything to worry about it shouldn't be a problem. None of us like dealing with cops, most people would agree there are real a$$hole cops out there but that's all the more reason to do what they ask.
A farce, huh? Including yours, too, of course.
4th date if sex was the 3rd date
From the spate of bombings from 1880 to 1920, the Haymarket bombing, the Wall Street bombing of 1920, the assassinations of McKinley and Kennedy, the attempted assassination of FDR, the Weathermen, the SDS, various other violence and bombings of the late 60's and 70's, the Left has been responsible for far more violence in the US than the Right. That's true even if you make Southern racial atrocities right wing, which is not necessarily the case.
Suppose if you really wanted to know, you could find out.
Yes. It is wrong to intentionally kill anyone. That mentality ushers in the ideology that will happily permit euthanizing any burdensome terminally ill individuals merely to save medical expenses. I mean what is the point of prolonging anyone's life or continuing treatment for terminal illness. Just euthanize. The handicap, mentally ill, they all can go too.
He actually believes Paul invented a false Christianity, I think.
I don't know, if a silicon based alien came up to me and I thought she were cute, I'd date her.
Pot shouldn't be illegal.
Define ?murder ? and you will see you are clearly incorrect
I just gave you the information. Race was no factor at all. The law is clear. The feelings of the prosecutor had nothing to do with it. You're failing to understand that had this been an adult and not a child, the adult would be facing ATTEMPTED murder charges. So since that is the case, by the law I just provided you, there's not an option to charge the child as an adult even though he's older than 12.
It?s a crazy person?s enterprise.
At this point you're not asking a question, you're criticizing an example you don't understand or choose not to understand.
Probably, and to a point - I've never actually read it. I understand that the idea of fiqh is set here, and that it certainly has its share of Deuteronomy-style laws that belie the time it was written.
All of your concerns and points are real. I have no answers, but until real men and women of character step up and say ?No,? we may be looking at intermittent periods of chaos.
If you are just going to post vapid trolling I?ll block you. Your choice