Totally cutting and pasting on to a word doc, printing. Going to pass this out at the next "resistance" gathering I see.
Genesis isn't a fact. You still can't parse this.
Again, what design or logo did this couple request on the cake that this homophobic bigot objected to?
So, the fact that karma is an epistemological challenge means that it cannot be an objective ontological reality?
It is certainly not meaningless or trivial. It is Bible-based truth. Jesus did not run a "sect" even though other people termed it a sect. The Sadducees and Pharisees were not sects either. They were like political parties are today.
Why shouldn't I speak the truth about my faith's crimes?
The bible isn't a historical record. It's a collection of stories from unknown authors. Most stories have a hint of truth to them but are then embellished upon.
Thanks and good riddance
A satanic ritual? Oh brother. ???????? Homosexuality has existed since the dawn of time.
That is Christian doctrine. Why did Paul not speak about the miracles of Jesus? Like when Jesus walked on water, turned water into wine etc. Obviously he did not know about Jesus or what he did. And miracles are supposed to follow Christians like they did to Jesus and Paul. So they were/are relevant to christians.
No. To ye tilki po anhlishkiy.
Many of those kids came here illegally by the thousands on trains from Honduras and Guatemala. We have a duty to send them back to their homelands and not decide we're going to "raise" them in warehouses with gov employees for parents.
I looked at the bottom of the page. The author of this piece, Thomas Burnett, is an editor of the BioLogos Foundation. BioLogos was founded by Francis Collins, lead scientist of the Human Genome Project and a Christian activist. Collins has a pretty impressive CV but I don't think that we need a god to explain evolution. As Hawking has said that while we cannot disprove god we have made him "unnecessary".
Another good verse giving possible objective moral guidelines that many here would fight against admitting are objectively moral.
Quotemining, taking things out of context, and using ignorant lying homophobic websites. Pathetic.
It does let the other person know you're looking every day, which I think some stalkers see as a perk rather than a drawback...
Copypasta. Cute. You don't know me very well, obviously.
Science can disprove the accounts in the Bible, but obviously can't disprove the existence of God.
how far can we take this metaphor?
Na, na,that's cool. No apologies needed.You were trying to explain things. That's understandable. :D
Nope they are 2 different things.
That's a non-sequitur.
Sure, you make a valid point - you seem rational.
Let the systemically oppressed man bashing begin!
Genetics doesn't support Adam and Eve, pretty much no scientific field supports a global flood in human history. We don't have any credible accounts of the "zombie uprising" that came with Jesus's supposed resurrection. We have no credible evidence that the Exodus ever took place, or that there ever was a mass enslavement of Jews in Egypt. Tyr still stands, Egypt isn't going to be speaking any extinct languages.
"All criminal justice involves doing something to a criminal that itself would be criminal if it were not done by a proper authority figure"
Plan B? Plan A failed? Your view of God is so poor. The word faith appears not one time in the OT, believe occurs 15 times. "I the LORD do not change. ?
Aw I love Ted Danson.
Yes, but they pretty much only think he is real to the extent to which I described. And, when the odds are only 2 to 1... that isn't nearly the level of certainty needed to claim the existence is PROVEN.
Ah yes. Because this kind of shit just falls from the sky. Not like they'd make a different decision based on what they've been doing for decades.