Hi - mistake - have a great day!
You did not respond, so you are ok for horrible painful deaths of i.e. children caused directly or with explicit order from your god? I know NT is something better then OT but as like to say the sadistic monster is the very same.
It appears that you're espousing some sort of deist position. Fine. But we still need evidence of its existence since, as you claim, it's within the natural realm (i.e. Entirety of Nature as you call it).
Religious speakers can come in, jewish speakers, muslims, gays, sex education etc....all could be allowed to speak at a school in an assembly.
Trump is definitely on a hot streak right now. The Left likes to focus on things that don't matter (like an affair prior to being president), while the Right focuses on things that do matter (3 Americans finally coming home). Not hard to see who is more sound right now.
*I'm not giggling. YOU'RE giggling* teeeeheeee
You realize that's not a good argument right? That you've just equated god with an idea.... and dismiss the claims that it has some effect on reality. Because if it had an effect on reality... like gravity... we'd have some observation we can posit must certainly come from god. But we don't. Heck... you can't even prove its YOUR god that you assert created the earth and not someone else's god. So lets try:
Thanks for the thoughtful commentary, generalisimo. Once again, thanks for helping to fill out my impression of Mises' view, and thanks for connecting the dots with Dr. Peterson. I agree with a lot of what you wrote.
And those 3,000,000 + women mourn the loss of their babies. No one is murdering miscarried babies, so I don?t have to fight for their rights. The mothers aren?t counseled into murder, so they aren?t committing vicious acts. No instead they grieve. They grieve the loss of human life. The difference... the only difference.. is a ?wanted? and ?unwanted? baby. There should be no such thing as ?unwanted? human life and humans should not have a ?right? to discard life like it doesn?t matter.
I thought this was a prog: see the look of horror as you violate their dearly held dogma?
Fet life dot org and remember we're all people, top and bottom, and get to know the people before you start the scene.
As I said before, that is fine if that is what you want to believe. You should know that it is based solely on some ancient texts. However it only applies to those who for one reason or another accept it; it has no validity outside of your personal opinion. I don't even accept the idea of sin, which only exists in the heads of believers.
Usually engaging them in a couple replies.
Bam and Pebbles new car ......
A "Straight Pride" month would be non-inclusive. /sarc
yep. I wanted to use the scenario in the news but I purposely used lifestyle choice instead of LGBTQ. If someone doesn't have to treat same-sex couples exactly the same as different-sex couples when it clearly isn't as simple as a lifestyle choice, what's to stop them from saying they heard you're swingers and their religion disagrees with that actual lifestyle choice so they can't bake your cake?
I like your interpretations. You?re ? ?gettin? down to the nitty gritty ?
If you are unable to back up your claim of science being wrong, you are simply ranting foolishness. That is your problem, and I can't help you. As far as your impotent posthumous threat is concerned, it doesn't scare adults.
Hey there Euv!