As I already stated below:
Well, let's have a little bit of background. This thread started with my claim that "The existence of God cannot be disproved"
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this." Einstein 1954 letter.
I am fine with vouchers as long as all schools are treated equally. They would not be. But if they were I would be OK. If someone wants their kids to grow up scientifically ignorant - their choice.
More "responsible" gun owners LOSING their weapons!
It also says those who worship other gods should be put to death:
That is quite a blanket statement about charity.
You have brought nothing but juvenile idiocy to every conversation. Why should this one be any different? You are a parrot of other peoples thoughts, nothing more.
That's a hilarious bit of judgment coming from a "Circus-tent Christian." Every "Christian" church has its man-made add-ons and errors. There are no exceptions. The more any group claims to have it "straight from God's lips," the more you can bet that they do not.
Girrrl, fatal attraction in this bih. Lol
I try to think for myself, rather than assume.
The glorious few moments when Peter Parker was married to Mary Jane, Aunt May was alive and Mary Jane was expecting. Unfortunately that happiness was tainted by the stupid clone saga.
Keep kids in bubbles; Insulate them from real life.
Baloney. Science begins with observation. Someone sees something they do not understand, so they investigate. The scientific method provides an algorithm for investigation. Assumption does too but it is an extremely unproductive algorithm.
Nah, I am less than a foot but you?re really not my type anyway, so I won?t get more specific.
That was some excellent apologetics.
If they are based on religion, and they are, they are unconstitutional
It happened in Babylon of course and Jeremiah is relating information that is releveant to his time
Yes, of course, I'm aware of that.
Crying shortly after birth is instinctual in a healthy child.
That blind item website allegedly run by RDJ hints that Spielberg and Geffen are long time pedos and were involved in Corey Haim going nuts and Drew Barrymore's wild child era.
I said nothing about deciding to pay taxes. I was drawing the distinction taxes being used to fund a personal choice.
You need to research this topic. Everything you believe is a myth preached by your false preachers. Y?all have no authority over Scripture. In fact, your entire reformation is founded on the lie imposed by CHANGING Sacred Scripture. No pope has ever nor will ever be able to change anything in Sacred Scripture. Everything the Church teaches is according to His Word. In fact She is responsible for giving you the Word, which You corrupt with your heresies.
I didn't say all the time. I said repeatedly. And niamh repeatedly shows respect to Gillette, where Gillette repeatedly disrespects niamh.
Care to enunciate and source these attributes and principles of moral judgment from this god of yours. Claim is not synonymous with proof.
Yes, I agree it's uncalled for.
What? What you emailed me? Good thing you edited! Tisk tisk!
I like proper punctuation but you don't see me complaining.
hopefully they're nor dumb enough to vote Spend Spend Spend Tax Tax Tax Horwath.
good to know you think your stupidity is funny. at least you have that.
You're comparing apples to oranges when you compare atheism to Christianity. You should compare atheism to theism. Does theism demand people to forgive each other or give to the poor? No, theism is just a belief that a god exists, just as atheism is just a lack of that belief. Neither atheism nor theism prescribe a particular set of morals. If you want to compare moral systems to Christianity than you should examine and compare secular humanism or some other moral philosophy.
Anyway, have a blessed day.