Spaghetti for sure
You also talked about "defending one's country" in a comment that insinuated support of a terribly hateful commenter on here, James Connelly, who did specifically talk about Muslims.
What's it matter? It's fiction.
I have no clue how this is relevant to the OP
No I've been out living my life, now I'm stuck in an office again talking to you morons.
OK, LOL. Well done for being 79.
When will America do that with anti-science Republicans in power?
Right, so we are stuck in the circular logic trap of everyone being a "bad guy" and you refusing to make a distincition.
When the emperors were Pagan, the argued that Christianity was a threat; when they were Christians, they argued that heresy, apostasy, and Paganism were threats. The Church had already begun forming its views of heresy before the emperors got in the game. The formative period for the development of the Christian idea of heresy was from 132 CE to about 170 CE, in the aftermath of the failed Bar Kochba Revolt. Quite a bit happened in these decades, including the Church's increasing demonization of Judaism (starting with Justin Martyr's "Dialogue with Trypho"), the first formal ecclesiastical trials for heresy presided over by the bishop of Rome, and the publication of Irenaeus of Lyon's "Against All Heresies," which marked the dawn of heresiology as a genre and a method.
I will not apologize.
I mean here in Virginia, most people get married in a church and the churches I have seen don't even have large scale reception rooms...My church has a small fellowship room but no room for tables. I mean I could see you getting 50 people in there but no sitting
Hummingbird milk and virgin cloud milkshakes! ???????? im dead!
Dammit prime I?m a physicist not a climatologist ! Which by the way is not really a scientist
Anyway, have a blessed day.
Thanks, you are awesome!
You simply don't understand the scientific implications of what an atheist is forced to believe. According to science, for our universe to exist by chance, there must be 10^123 other universes. This is called the multiverse. The ones that really have to believe in fairy tales are atheists. There are other scientific implications that atheist must believe that are even more out of a Mother Goose book than the multiverse. Up to about 20 years ago, science could pretty much support the idea of atheism but now we know that just the opposite it true.
It would seem this guy thinks only white kids misbehave. Strange.
Is that why you continue to bring up "Texas IQ"?
Old Testament - Figuratively
Mine is a beer shaped hole.
typical sky is falling liberal answer
You're kind of ignoring a lot of education we actually get to train us to be good. What if parents didn't teach children to do good things? What would happen?
You don't understand atheist. True, we don't believe in God. But many of us arrived at that non belief by questioning things. Religion provokes one to ask questions. What are we in denial of? Certainly not an imaginary God. Most of us are readers. We have read the Bible since it is always being shoved in our faces. That book confirms for many of us, that there is no God. You should look deeper into things, before you draw conclusions.
Not at all
Opposition status for the ndp is ok.
Women do this yes, but they usually have less chances because they have less access to power
Being an atheist shooter doesn't mean they are representing atheism. There is nothing to represent.